AI governance and compliance
Governance that lets AI clear a board and a regulator at the same time, including AI that acts, not just advises. Built on recognized frameworks, expressed in language a non-technical board can approve.
Who it is for
Banks, healthcare platforms, governments, and any institution deploying AI under supervision.
What you get
- An AI governance framework aligned to the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and ISO/IEC 42001
- Risk and control mapping across your AI systems
- Agentic-AI controls: authority, boundaries, reversibility, and human checkpoints
- Documentation that speaks to a regulator and a board from the same source
- Pre-deployment adversarial review of each consequential system
How it works
- Assess the current AI estate and its exposure
- Design the governance framework on a recognized foundation
- Map the local and sector requirements on top
- Verify each system before it is deployed
Questions
Which frameworks do you align to?
Recognized international foundations, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and ISO/IEC 42001, with the local and sector requirements of your jurisdiction layered on top.
Can you govern agentic AI?
Yes. Governing AI that acts adds control over what it is authorized to do, the boundaries it cannot cross, whether its actions can be reversed, and where a human must approve.
Discuss this work
Related: AI governance for regulated institutions · Agentic AI governance · AI governance in the Middle East · All services